Skip to content

Eflios Visibility · AI search and GEO monitoring

See where AI recommends your competitors – and what to improve.

Track your brand across real buyer questions, inspect the sources and facts behind those answers, and prioritize changes you can measure again.

The pilot is invitation-only. One email when it opens – nothing else.

  • real buyer questions
  • fact monitoring
  • prioritized recommendations
  • measured again after implementation
AI visibility snapshotexample report
  • unbranded visibility31%

    52 buyer questions · pooled n = 468

  • fact errors4

    claims that conflict with approved facts

  • citation gaps7

    3 high-priority off-site sources

  • recommended changes5

    page- and source-specific actions ready

Frozen prompt set · three samples per question · measurement method labeled for every engine.

Product walkthrough

See why a competitor wins the answer – and what to change.

Choose a buyer question. Eflios shows the sources attached to the answer, checks the claim against an approved fact, and turns the gap into a recommendation you can test.

buyer_question · Perplexity API sampleexample answer

“What are the best fleet-tracking platforms for UK logistics teams?”

RoadMetric and FleetBase are commonly recommended for route planning and compliance. Northgate Fleet is positioned as a basic GPS tracker for smaller teams.

Sources shaping this answer

FleetTech IndexLogistics Stack
claim → fact → fixillustrative
01AI’s claim
Northgate Fleet is positioned as a basic GPS tracker for smaller teams.
02Verified fact
Automated compliance reporting is available on every paid plan.

03Recommended change

ready to implement

Add a self-contained compliance section and correct the FleetTech Index listing.

page · /fleet-management

Evidence gap: Two cited category pages omit Northgate’s compliance features.

Measure again

Re-crawl the page, then resample the approved comparison prompts.

Illustrative product walkthrough using fictional company data. Changing a tab does not call an external model.

The loop

Measuring is the easy half

A dashboard that tells you you’re at 31% and stops is a report. The subscription is the closed loop: a recommendation, and the next measurement showing what changed.

  1. 01

    Measure

    A frozen, approved prompt set, sampled across engines on your cadence.

  2. 02

    Diagnose

    Which sources are repeatedly cited, which passages can’t survive extraction, what the models get wrong.

  3. 03

    Fix

    A brief, a click path or an agent prompt – specific to your platform, not generic advice.

  4. 04

    Verify

    Re-crawl to confirm the change landed, then check whether those prompts now return you.

Your first scan

Four outputs you can act on.

Not a wall of monitoring features. The first useful result is a clear picture of what is happening, why, and what to change next.

Visibility baseline

Where you appear, how you are framed, and which competitors win the same buyer questions.

Fact errors

Claims assistants repeatedly get wrong, checked against the ground truth you approve.

Citation gaps

Sources repeatedly cited for your category that mention competitors but leave you out.

Priority fixes

Specific page and source changes, ranked and ready to measure after implementation.

The difference

Monitoring tells you the score. Eflios tells you what to do next.

What you see
Typical:A mention percentage
Eflios:Presence, position and framing
Diagnosis
Typical:Generic recommendations
Eflios:Source- and page-specific findings
Evidence
Typical:Your website
Eflios:On-site content and off-site citations
After the fix
Typical:Marked done
Eflios:Re-crawled and measured again

Cadence and cost

Choose how broadly – and how often – you want to measure.

Plans scale with the number of approved buyer questions, engines, sites, and how often you want the measurement repeated.

Pilot

by invitation
25 prompts, one engine, monthly, one site. Deliberately too small to be mistaken for a measurement program.

Starter

€149/mo
75 prompts, capacity for two supported engines, three samples each, up to three sites. Monthly or fortnightly.

Pro

€249/mo
100 prompts, capacity for four supported engines, up to ten sites, cadence up to weekly, plus regression alerts and crawler logs.

The pilot is unpaid and invitation-only – enough to see a real citation gap list and decide whether the output is worth paying for. Full Visibility pricing

Join the waiting list

Coverage and methodology

Know exactly what the measurement represents.

Coverage names the surface and the way it was sampled. Results stay comparable only when the approved questions, engine, locale, and sampling method stay consistent.

pilot coverage1 engine available now

Engine

Perplexity

Sampled through the Sonar API, which searches the same grounded index as Perplexity’s consumer product.

Sampling

Three runs per question

The same approved buyer question is sampled three times. A frozen question set keeps later measurements comparable.

Boundary

A repeatable sample

Personalization, account history, and chat context are absent. Recommendations are measured again; an improved answer is not guaranteed.

Questions

Questions before you join

What does Visibility actually measure?

A prompt set you approve is sampled repeatedly across supported engines. Eflios records whether you appear, where you appear, how you are framed, which competitors appear beside you, which sources are cited, and which factual claims conflict with your ground truth.

Which AI assistants and engines are covered?

The pilot currently measures Perplexity only, through its Sonar API. The API searches the same grounded index as the consumer product, but has no personal account, memory, or chat history. The two- and four-engine plan limits are capacity for additional supported surfaces as they become available, not a claim that those surfaces are available today.

Are API results the same as answers in a consumer AI app?

Not exactly. Perplexity Sonar uses the same search index as Perplexity’s consumer product, but personalization, account history, and conversation context can still change an answer. Eflios keeps every surface and measurement method labeled so results are interpreted within those boundaries.

Why can’t I change my prompts whenever I like?

You can – but it’s an explicit, versioned act, not a quiet inline save. Editing prompts mid-stream breaks trend comparability, and the numbers only become yours if you signed off on the questions.

Why is the number lower than the competitor tool I trialed?

Most likely because they blended branded prompts into it. A brand nearly always appears in answers about itself, so mixing the two produces a flattering number that measures nothing.

Do I need Eflios Forms as well?

No, they’re separate purchases. But with both, an assistant referral can be joined through to the form submission it produced and to what your CRM said that lead became – the one thing a monitoring-only vendor structurally cannot do.

Early access

Find the sources cited in AI answers about your market.

Join the pilot and start with a ranked citation-gap list for your category: the sources that appear in sampled answers, and which ones do not currently mention you.

  • email only
  • no newsletter
  • deleted on request
  • no card

One email when Eflios opens – nothing else, no newsletter. Ask us any time and the entry is deleted.